NFL Player Daniel Fells Seems to Have Overcome MRSA. But That Doesn’t Mean it’s Over

You can be in your physical prime, as strong as they come, have access to the best of medical care in the country, and still be hit hard – real hard — by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). That’s the case right now with New York Giants tight end Daniel Fells.

On Oct. 2, Fells, 32, appeared in an emergency room with a 104-degree temperature. Doctors diagnosed a MRSA infection in his ankle and admitted him to hospital. He was immediately given antibiotics but they couldn’t control it. The concern, therefore, was that the MRSA would spread. Not just to the bone and tissue in his foot, which would then require amputation; but if it got into his bloodstream it could be fatal. So Fells was transferred to the ICU and underwent a series of five surgeries to save his foot and his life.

Daniel Fells

Daniel Fells

So far so good – sort of. Daniel Fells is still in hospital but he is out of ICU. His foot seems to have been saved from amputation but he may require further surgeries. And the NY Daily News is reporting that his football career is likely over because of the extensive damage to his foot.

Fells is not alone among athletes with his MRSA. A 2007 ESPN report, MRSA Has Sidelined Careers, Even Caused Deathsays MRSA is endemic in professional sports and mentions several high profile athletes who contracted it including Grant Hill of the Orlando Magic, Junior Seau of the New England Patriots, Paul Pierce of the Boston Celtics, Drew Gooden of the Cleveland Cavaliers, and Braylon Edwards of the Cleveland Browns. Since the ESPN report came out there’s been further outbreaks in the NFL in Cleveland and Washington, and in Tampa where MRSA has recently ended the careers of Buccaneer players Carl Nicks and Lawrence Tynes.

And there’s this: One in 4 patients discharged from the hospital after being treated for MRSA will have to go back, often more than once, to the ICU and require further surgery. That’s because MRSA is easily spread to most surfaces you’ve had contact with and so you can easily pick it up again. That’s why the Giants, for example, hired infection specialists to clean their facilities. But Daniel Fells wasn’t taken to the ER from the team facilities, he was taken there from his home. Where, recent science also tells us, among households with people recently treated for it, MRSA is regularly found and spread to the other people who live there.

Daniel Fells lives with his wife and 2 young children.

Britain Unveils its Back-to-School Plan to Fight Antibiotic-Resistant Infections

It’s suppertime. And you’re going to do the right thing: skip that fast food joint too-conveniently located around the corner and prepare that healthy homemade pizza everyone loves. As you’re congratulating yourself on your choice in walks your 10-year old who politely asks if you have washed your hands. Not quite willing to fess up that you haven’t you try an artful dodge: Um, why do you ask, young lady? To which you get something like:

child drBecause germs on your hands can spread to Daddy and me through the food you’re touching. And if a bad bug gets in your bloodstream it’s serious. I even know how it works:

“Each microbe has special markers or antigens on their surface which is special to just that microbe. Specific white blood cells see these microbes and their antigens. And make specific antibodies to attach to that particular antigen. These antibodies lock onto the microbe with the corresponding antigen. The antibodies then mark the harmful microbe for destruction. And stay in the bloodstream to fight that antigen should it ever return.”

No, your 10-year-old probably wouldn’t put it that way. However, those are the exact words used in the computer animation “Counter Attack,” which is 1 of 14 computer games designed for British school children, ages 7 – 11. That’s not a typo: this stuff is for kids. It’s part of the new British health authority guidelines released this week aimed at teaching students, age 7 though university, about drug-resistant bugs. In addition to games, the e-Bug website has home science experiments, quizzes, a disease fact file (explaining MRSA, for example), and a Fact of the Week: “Scientists believe that there are more bacteria in your body than the actual number of cells in your body.”

We saw this coming. Last year, Prime Minister David Cameron warned the public that “We are in danger of going back to the Dark Ages of medicine to see infections that were treatable not be treatable and you would see many thousands of people potentially die from these infections.”

Following that announcement his government released a report at Christmastime predicting drug resistant infections will kill an extra 10 million people a year worldwide – more than currently die from cancer – by 2050 unless action is taken. And so the health guidelines released Tuesday constitute, in part, that action.

So if you’re having trouble convincing your 10-year-old that hand washing before meals is important, I suggest the interactive e-Bug game “Soapy Soakers”(click on “Horrid Hands”). You’re shrunk down to microbe size and placed onto an unwashed hand. Armed with a soap gun and confronted with gnarly-looking bugs, your job is to knock’em dead. Can you figure out how to chase the critter, jump in the air and shoot him, all at the same time? So cool!








Are We As Smart As We Think?

A popular story in the New York Times this week is No, You Don’t Have to Drink 8 Glasses of Water a Day. It says that contrary to conventional wisdom it’s not true that you have to drink that much water; there’s just no science behind it. In fact, it turns out to be a myth that traces back to a 1945 Food and Nutrition Board recommendation that said people need about 2.5 liters of water daily. But everyone forgot the sentence that followed: “Most of this quantity is contained in prepared foods.”

smartAnother interesting myth is that we only use 10% of our brain: not so again; recent evidence tells us we use pretty much all of it.

While these myths seem relatively harmless, there are a number of “truths” floating around in the field of infectious disease that do cause harm.

For example, we generally believe hospitals to be safe places. Yes, they’re staffed by dedicated professionals and we only go there when we have to, but hospitals are not as safe as we think. Incredibly, twice as many people die of preventable hospital deaths every week in the US – some 8,400 people — than died in all of the Iraq War. And about 25% of these deaths occur because of infections you contract at the hospital.

Perhaps the biggest misconception we adhere to is that antibiotics cure sore throats, runny noses, chest colds, and pneumonia’s. For the most part antibiotics don’t work on these things because they’re caused by viruses and antibiotics only kill bacteria.

And when you use antibiotics inappropriately you inadvertently create another problem for yourself: you increase your chance of getting an infection. That’s because most antibiotics kill ALL bacteria, the “good” and the “bad.” Your good bacteria operate in conjunction with your immune system to protect you from disease. So if you knock them out with an antibiotic and are then exposed to a disease-causing germ, the chance of that germ making you sick goes up – way up. As one specialist puts it: “Has any health-care professional ever told you that taking antibiotics would increase your susceptibility to infection?”

Then there’s the myth that we’ve conquered diseases that we actually haven’t. Take for example the biggest contagion in human history – the Black Death, also known as the Bubonic Plague, or simply the Plague, that in the 14th C knocked off as many as 200 million people.

Since April of this year 11 people in the US have become infected with the Plague and 3 have died, which is about triple the normal rate.

We don’t hear much about the Plague because with early intervention antibiotics can treat it. But there’s a catch: we’re approaching what the World Health Organization and others call a post-antibiotic era where, increasingly, these drugs just aren’t working anymore. So much so that a recent UK government report predicts that antibiotic resistant infections will cause more deaths – about 10 million a year — than cancer by the year 2050.

Which brings us to our final myth: given the looming peril these huge numbers indicate we’ll now give antibiotic resistant disease the attention it deserves – or maybe not. Because psychologists tell us that just the opposite happens: “When the numbers [of dead or injured] go up, the amount of sympathy people feel goes perversely down. And with it goes the willingness to donate money or time to help.” Psychologists call this the “collapse of compassion.” It means that “when people see multiple victims, they turn the volume down on their emotions for fear of being overwhelmed.” Put another way: The death of one person is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic.

The trick, of course, is to make sure that we don’t fall into that statistic.

Cancer and Antibiotic Resistance

Bad bugs like MRSA, much like criminals, are opportunistic: they take advantage of the vulnerable – the elderly, children, and people who are sick, such as cancer patients.

It works like this. Cancer is treated by surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy – using drugs to destroy cancer cells. Some patients undergo all three.

But as we know cancer treatment comes with side effects. A major one is the increased risk of contracting a serious, often deadly, infection.

cancerAnd when that happens we turn to antibiotics. In fact, many cancer patients need antibiotics during all stages of their treatment.

That’s because, with surgery, at least 5% of patients will develop an infection.

Radiation therapy kills cancer cells but it also kills nearby healthy cells of the hair, skin, mouth and gut linings. When we lose these protective barrier-like cells your risk of getting an infection goes up.

Chemotherapy, used to stop the growth of cancer cells, also weakens the immune system and so it too increases your risk of infection.

The upshot is that cancer survival rates decrease when you can’t control infections due to antibiotic resistance: i.e., the bad bugs have evolved (changed) since antibiotics were first introduced in the 1940s, and now they’re often too tough for the drugs to have any effect on. It’s as if they’ve acquired bullet proof vests and we’re still trying to kill them with 70-year-old six shooters.

This rise of resistance matters because according to the World Health Organization there’s approximately 14 million new cases of cancer worldwide each year. The WHO also tells us that the number of these new cases will go up a whopping 70% over the next two decades.

So is there anything that we can do about what the WHO calls “a problem so serious that it threatens the achievements of modern medicine,” such as cancer treatment?

The UK Global Initiative on Antibiotic Action says that not only is there something we can do, there’s actually something that we must do, and it’s this:

  1. Don’t ask and don’t expect antibiotics for colds, sore throats, or flu—these are caused by viruses so antibiotics don’t work.
  2. Only take antibiotics given to you by your doctor and EXACTLY as written on the bottle and always complete the full course.
  3. Never give your antibiotics to other people.

So the good news is that by doing something very simple, we can do something very good — we can, in a very concrete way, help cancer patients, now and into the future.

People like the girl in the picture, for instance.







Skin in the Game: We Now Have “Super Acne”

Scientists at Britain’s National Health Service told us this week that 4 out of 5 people who suffer from acne now have bacteria that are resistant to three of the most common antibiotics used to treat the condition – erythromycin, tetracyclines, and clindamycin – hence the term “super acne.” What’s more, these resistant bacteria can be spread by direct contact from one person to the next.

acneThis matters because 8 out of 10 teenagers already experience acne and while for most people it will disappear with age, for some it continues well into adulthood. Left untreated, it can have a big psychosocial impact and cause scarring.

And then there’s our old friend Staphylococcus aureus, a common cause of skin infections, among other and more serious things. In a separate study, also released this week, researchers at King’s College Hospital, London, looked at Staph’s resistance to antibiotics and found that it has almost doubled over the last 7 years. Specifically, they found that 30% of samples taken from general dermatology patients in 2014 were resistant to the antibiotic erythromycin. In 2007, only 17% of the samples were found to be resistant.

Commenting on the studies, Nina Goad of the British Association of Dermatologists says: “The growing resistance to antibiotics among skin patients generally and among acne patients more specifically, as highlighted by these two studies, is of concern.”

But there’s a deeper issue here: while the crisis of antibiotic resistance is usually framed as a coming event, it’s actually with us now. Here’s an example of how the issue is typically put, and you’ll notice the reference to the future:

“Many aspects of medicine, if you do not have antibiotics, we will not be able to do: intensive care unit medicine goes out the window; complicated surgery goes out the window; cancer chemotherapy goes out the window; [safely delivering] premature babies goes out the window; organ transplants – all that stuff is only possible to do if you have effective antibiotics.”

These are the words – from the video below – of one of the smartest guys in the room when it comes to this stuff: Brad Spellberg, MD, author of Rising Plague, and professor of medicine and chief medical officer over at the Los Angeles County and the University of Southern California Medical Center.

But what of the present? Do we have evidence that antibiotics are failing us right now? Spellberg gives us one example:

“You get a urinary tract infection and we’re seeing patients that we have to hospitalize to put on IV antibiotics because there’s no oral antibiotics left anymore for these patients.”

As the World Health Organization said last year: “… antimicrobial resistance … is no longer a prediction for the future, it is happening right now in every region of the world and has the potential to affect anyone, of any age, in any country.”

In other words, as time passes, more of us are having skin the game – quite literally.


A Healthy Conversation

Life can be overwhelming when it comes to society’s big challenges such as climate change or war in the Middle-East. A typical response may go something like, “So what can I do about it?”

A case in point is the new kid on the block: antibiotic resistance, the rising plague that a UK government report says will cause more deaths than cancer by 2050. To the question, “So what can I do about it?” there is actually a very good answer – talk to your doctor about the harmful effects of antibiotics.

Dr. Eric Howell

Dr. Eric Howell

The suggestion comes to us from Eric Howell, MD, who teaches and practices at Johns Hopkins Medical Center. In his recent essay posted on The Hospital Leader, he says doctors have inadvertently trained their patients to believe that there is an easy solution to almost any common medical problem. And that’s where antibiotics come in: They have been, he says, the physician’s knee-jerk reaction to a number of patient symptoms for decades, especially for a cough or upper respiratory infection. The problem, however, isn’t so much that these are typically viral-based conditions that antibiotics have no effect on – any more so than on a broken leg, for example; the real problem is that antibiotics have side effects – i.e., they can hurt you.

How so? According to Dr. Howell:

1. Many antibiotics can cause diarrhea.

2. Using antibiotics can lead to other painful and even fatal conditions, like Clostridium difficile.

3. Use of antibiotics today could make you resistant to antibiotics later in life, when you might really need them. As New York University professor Martin Blaser, MD, has been saying for years: “Has any health-care professional ever told you that taking antibiotics would increase your susceptibility to infection?”

4. Overuse of antibiotics doesn’t only affect the patient, but entire communities as well. By creating antibiotic-resistant bacteria, we make everyone more vulnerable to the very diseases that the antibiotics were originally intended to treat, like tuberculosis, staph infections, and numerous others.

Howell’s essay is premised on the notion that doctors are guilty of over-prescribing antibiotics. For example, he cites a study that says 3 in 10 antibiotics prescribed for hospitalized patients aren’t necessary. So Howell’s message is directed at physicians.

But the other side of the coin is that because patients are trained “to believe that there is an easy solution to almost any common medical problem,” we reflexively seek out antibiotics believing, again, that there are no downsides: If they work, great, but if they don’t then so what, it’s not like they can hurt me. To which the Harvard School of Public Health would say to you, not so fast: antibiotics have a huge downside, so please stop asking for them.

Now for the bonus material: Courtesy of Dr. Howell’s post, for those who want this message delivered hip hop style, check out ZDoggMD’s video, “Dawn of the Diff (C. Diff Rap Zombie Apocalypse)”!

Yes, “ZDogg” is actually a real doctor – UC San Francisco and Stanford, no less.

Peace out.



Actress Leslie Ash Turns the Corner on Her 11-Year Struggle with MRSA

British actress Leslie Ash, best known for her role in the sitcom Men Behaving Badly, and her well-publicized battle with MRSA underscores an important difference between antibiotic-resistant infections and the ones you and I experience: they are too often life-long affairs.

In 2004, while having “energetic” sex with her husband, she fell out of bed, cracked two ribs and punctured her lung. At London’s Chelsea and Westminster hospital, while undergoing an epidural, MRSA entered her body and attacked her spine – leaving her paralyzed.

In the beginning: Leslie Ash and her husband, ex-footballer, Lee Chapman

In the beginning: Leslie Ash and her husband, ex-footballer, Lee Chapman

Without any feeling in her legs, unable to walk, and facing the possibility she would never do so again, her fight began: wheelchair bound, on pain medication, acting career on hold – perhaps permanently, and needing rigorous physical therapy.

Five years later, she described her life this way: “I’ve lived through being hoisted in and out of bed and not being able to sit up, being in terrible pain, being in wheelchairs, on crutches or with this stick. I had the rug pulled from under me and my whole world was flipped up in the air. The one big thing in my life was my career. I’ve worked since I was 15. If there was any chance of getting that back in any way, shape or form, I wanted to do it.”

Six years further on – just this week – Ms. Ash announced she will indeed resume her acting career, that she is finally free of her pain medication, and can, for the most part, walk on her own.

But MRSA has left its footprint. Her spine will be permanently damaged. She has had to hire a specialist physical trainer to continue to build up her strength. In an interview with the Huffington Post she explained:

“Biomechanics is like a neuropathic pathway and that is exactly what I need because of the damage to my spine. I can stand better now and I am working on my strength and my core stability and I can actually walk around without a stick.”

There are 2 million stories of struggle with resistant infections like Leslie Ash’s every year in the U.S. alone.

Not all of them will turn out as well as hers.

Leslie and Lee today.

Leslie and Lee today.


A Profile in Courage: 11-year-old Addie Rerecich

“The first thing that crossed my mind was, ‘Am I dying?’” said 11-year-old Addie Rerecich, of Tucson, Arizona.

This was 2011. Addie was bedridden in the hospital. Her body was overcome by a Staphylococcus infection. Her lungs were failing. Without a double lung transplant she would die. But surgery would be tricky because other drug-resistant bacteria were also growing in her slender frame.

Thankfully, Addie would eventually pull through, but her struggle continues.

In the video below the interviewer asks Addie if she would mind showing people her scars. “No, I’m kind of proud of them,” comes the spunky reply. And promptly lifts her shirt to reveal multiple gunshot-looking wounds to her belly. What draws your attention, however, is the deep scar that cuts diagonally across her right hip, the remnants of the Staph infection that began it all, which she describes as “the size of a football at one point.”

Here is Addie in her own words:

We understand life by comparing new events to what we have experienced. For example, when we hear that in the US alone, over 2 million people a year contract an antibiotic-resistant infection – and live, we understand that to mean they go through something like we have, with pneumonia, say.

Addie, now 15, makes her story public because she wants you to know that that’s not how it works. Her mother Tonya, a nurse, describes 3 key differences with drug-resistant infections:

They move quick: “Within 24 hours, my little girl went from happy and healthy to being intubated and hooked to a breathing machine. Her small body was riddled with tubes and wires.”

Drugs don’t work: “Addie’s doctors had run out of the most common antibiotics used to treat these serious bacteria so, in desperation, they turned to an antibiotic known as colistin. Colistin is very powerful, but it is also so highly toxic to the kidneys and other organs that doctors rarely use it.  We started saying extra prayers.”

It’s a life sentence: “When we left the hospital, Addie was in a wheelchair. She had lost the use of her left arm, had almost no vision in her left eye, and had restricted vision in her right eye. She had limited use of her left leg. She had suffered a stroke. She had lost 30 pounds, almost one third of her body weight. She was so weak and debilitated that she couldn’t even turn herself side to side in bed. With intensive therapy Addie is improving, but progress is slow, and no one is sure how much function she can regain. My once normal, strong, athletic Addie will need medical attention and therapy for the rest of her life.”

“I’m so grateful that she’s still with us and that we made it through, but my heart aches when she looks up at me and asks, ‘Why me?’, because I don’t have an answer.”

A Father’s Fears

How should we handle this case?

A little south of Cape Canaveral on Florida’s Atlantic coast, 16-year-old Noah Meyers remains confined in his isolation room at the local Merritt Island hospital. One week ago Noah contracted methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). His father, Bill Meyers, a former paramedic, believes it was from Noah’s football equipment: “All I know is that the marks that are on my son’s head, scalp, face, chin and neck. They are everywhere that the football helmet hit him. We can’t even give him a hug. He’s scared,” said Bill. “If people don’t realize how serious MRSA is, they need to.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

What Bill Meyers wants for his son is what all families of the more than 80,000 MRSA-sufferers (in the U.S. alone) want: “I just want to make sure Noah is cured and is better, and I want to make sure that nobody else gets this.”

But there’s a catch: Almost 20% of people with MRSA skin infection will remain persistently colonized, according to new research conducted by Valerie Cluzet, PhD, from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

Of the 243 patients Cluzet’s study followed, 48 (19.8%) remained persistently colonized. Furthermore, patients with persistent colonization tended to be older than patients who achieved clearance and were more likely to have a household member with MRSA colonization.

The treatment implication is both clear and novel: “These results give us an idea of who is going to be persistently colonized with MRSA, and will help us better target that population,” said Dr. Cluzet. “We may have to advise not only the patients but also the people they are living with to … get rid of the [MRSA] colonization.”

Bill Meyers believes his son’s MRSA didn’t come from the family, it came from the school’s football equipment. On the other hand, the school district isn’t so sure, saying that the helmets were just reconditioned and sanitized, were not shared between players, and they are looking into it.

Remember, the chief finding of the study isn’t that the MRSA necessarily came from a household member. It’s that once MRSA attaches itself to you, there’s a 1 in 5 chance it will remain on your body – and thus available to be given to others – even after you’re “cured” and sent home from the hospital.

So getting back to what Bill Meyers so reasonably wants – for Noah to be cured and for no one else to have to go through what his son did – and given the findings of Dr. Cluzet’s study, what should we do in this case?

Order follow-up MRSA decontamination procedures for Noah – and if so, for how long? Years? And what about the rest of the people in the household?

If this were your family, what would you want?

If you smoke cigarettes, you’re turning MRSA into a super-superbug

smokingThe way we think about smoking and disease is that cigarette smoke causes illness by harming the smoker, for example, by weakening human respiratory and immune cells, by destroying organs such as the lungs, and so on.

While that’s certainly true, researchers at the University of California at San Diego have shown us a second and completely different way in which cigarette smoking will cause disease: by strengthening the pathogen that causes the illness.

The pathogen they used to test their idea was MRSA (Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus). Their method was to prepare 2 batches of it: the “regular” kind, and a second batch of MRSA that was exposed to cigarette smoke. They then infected human cells grown in a lab and live mice with the 2 kinds of MRSA to see if the effects were the same or different. Here’s what they found:

  1. The smoke-exposed MRSA were 4-times harder to kill than regular MRSA.
  2. The effect was dose-dependent, meaning that the more you exposed the MRSA to smoke, the more resistant it became.
  3. The smoke-exposed MRSA were better at invading human and mice cells and causing death. For example, 40 percent of mice infected with the smoke-exposed MRSA died of pneumonia, compared with 10 percent of the mice infected with regular MRSA.

In other words, smoking causes MRSA to be better at both offense and defense: it will kill at a much higher rate, and it’s harder to kill.

In humans, MRSA is typically – and conveniently – found in the nose and airways leading to the lungs. So when you smoke, what you’re doing is you’re bathing these bacteria in the smoke produced by the cigarette, thus turning them into the more potent pathogen that the UCSD experiment demonstrates.

In the fifty years since the first U.S. Surgeon General’s report in 1964 warned us about the link between smoking and lung cancer, nearly 21 million people (the population of Australia) have died prematurely because of smoking or exposure to secondhand smoke.

Or so we thought. In a study reported this February in The New England Journal of Medicine, researchers have added five more diseases and 60,000 deaths a year to the toll taken by tobacco in the United States. For example, compared with people who had never smoked, smokers were about twice as likely to die from infections and respiratory ailments, that were not previously linked to smoking.

Which entitles us to ask a question: What human behavior, including war, causes us more harm than smoking tobacco?







Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Staypressed theme by Themocracy